|
RESEARCH
Professional managers are not always awesome at managing their personal lives.
Upper Middle's Friendship Drift survey measured the radius and half-life of Oat Milk Elites' social circles. Focusing on the work of friendship, the survey sought to understand the source, value, and upkeep of voluntary relationships, and how people accustomed to managing things — careers, money, calendars, households — manage each other's expectations. Most upper-middle-class friendships begin in one of two places: school or work. Friendship is a shared project, and like most shared projects it emerges from other ones — failed chemistry classes and startups — receding when newer projects take precedence.
College is the most common source of close friends (23%), narrowly beating work (19%), with high school (14%) and then hobbies and hometowns trailing.
Getting By With a Lots of Help
The dominant cultural narrative is that everyone is drowning (and bowling) alone^[1]. But only a smaller number of survey respondents self-reported having no friends (4%) or only one friend (3%). The vast majority of respondents (75%) reported having between two and six friends with most of those respondents closer to six.
If 'ships are sinking, they are doing so slowly: roughly half of respondents reported the same number of friends as a few years ago (49%) – though more reported contraction (31%) than growth (20%). And many if not most of these relationships are durable – substantial enough to survive a 3 a.m. phone call. Asked how many people they could call during an emergency, more than nine in ten respondents (92%) could name at least two people, and nearly one in five could name more than five (19%).
 For working professionals, job constraints and rewards shape friendships in a wide variety of ways. The first and most obvious is that jobs serve as a source of new friends^[2], specifically for those in sales and business development who were more likely (50%) than others to report large social circles^[3]. Engineers reported the smallest circles, with none claiming seven or more close friends (0%). More contacts, more friends — it's a numbers game. The competent tend to befriend the competent, and end up with access to far more competence than any one life requires. The other factor strongly correlated with friend count is income. Among respondents earning under $100,000, a relatively small number of respondents (10%, n=21) reported seven or more close friends; among those earning $500,000+ over a third (36%) could field a basketball team and two subs. It's a gap in capacity, not affection: money matters because it buys time.
 Because friendships require time, time-poor management types^[4] let their low-performing friends go^[5]. Nearly half of respondents said they are letting a friendship die (46%). More than half of respondents under 35 (55%) were letting a friendship die while a bit less than half of respondents over 50 (39%) were going through the same regrettable process. Respondents worth under $500,000 were the more likely to be letting a friendship go (54%) that those worth $2.5 million or more (38%) regardless of income. And while it would be tempting to blame the go-go-go culture of Coastal Elites, there were no geographic trends in the data; this isn't a New York or San Francisco thing. You Can't Always Want What You Get
People want a friend who tells them hard truths. Whether they're willing to be one is another matter^[6]. Asked what matters most in a friend, respondents claimed to want someone who shows up in person for the big moments (29%), who is honest even when it's uncomfortable (24%), who checks in regularly (20%), and who listens without trying to fix things (11%). But though honesty was the second most valued quality in a friend (24%), it was only the third most common form of friend work respondents claimed to offer their amigos (15%). That gap was widest among younger respondents, who prized hard honesty at double the rate they claimed to deliver it (24% versus 11%). Respondents over 50 closed that gap signficantly (17% versus 12%), presumably in part through attrition.
 Showing up in person was the most desired form of friend work (29%) and the one most respondents claimed to do (27%). The rest of the friend work offered by respondents was practical: checking in by text (21%) and helping in a crisis (14%). Interestingly, only a handful (9%) actually want the extra help in a crisis. Competent professional people aren't really on the market for competence – even if it's something their friends can offer.
Most respondents felt they met their friends halfway (52%). Curiously, more respondents claimed to meet their friends more than halfway (10%) than not to (4%) with higher earners (19%)^[9] far more likely than any other group to claim going above and beyond^[7]. Given the data on friend retention, that is probably true – and potentially the source of a very specific sort of resentment.
Doesn't Anybody Stay in One Place
A quarter of respondents see their closest friends only a few times a year (25%). Many (41%) reported that their best friends live far away^[8] and that they only get to spend time together a few times a year (59%). That is disheartening, but it's also a sort of category error. The only explanation for time-poor respondents letting more convenient friendships wither while cultivating logistically complicated friendships is love. So that's nice. The Love You Make
Taken together, responses to Upper Middle's Friendship Drift survey demonstrate that professional managers tend to actively manage non-professional relationships. If there is a friendship or loneliness crisis^[10], it's less about a lack of friends than a lack of time and attention for them — and the resulting need to treat friendship as yet another form of work. Not that they take no pleasure in their friends — just that few can treat them as a stabilizing, joyful given. There's too much going on. The managed self — optimized and self-critical — persists into the one set of relationships that was supposed to be exempt from it.
But on the plus side: Should something go wrong at 3 a.m., we've got lots and lots of emergency contacts — far more than any crisis requires.
| 
